Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rio (film)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Keep; non-admin closure. Regard this as a unanimous keep after the article was expanded during the deletion discussion and referenced with reliable sources. Mkativerata (talk) 21:10, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

Rio (film)

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Delete this unreleased film. The notability of which has yet to be determined, if it ever comes out. JBsupreme (talk) 21:46, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:49, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
 *  Neutral, leaning Keep per improvements . Ks0stm (T•C•G) 23:45, 20 January 2010 (UTC) Yes, it is somewhat crystalline, but it has actors/actresses that are widely known, and my google searches came up with this, this, and this somewhat-dubious source. The IMDb source already on the page says the movie is currently filming, so it looks like this movie indeed will come out. Final notability can be determined once it has been released. Ks0stm (T•C•G) 05:04, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Since IMDb relies heavily upon user-generated content, we probably should not use them as a source. I know that it is specifically prohibited when dealing with BLP articles and frowned upon for all other articles in general.  JBsupreme (talk) 05:45, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep per improvements. Ignoring IMDB, the film project has received significant coverage in reliable sources: Variety, New York Times, Hollywood Reporter, Sci-Fi Wire, Monsters & Critics, Cinema Blend, et al. Considering the companies and persons involved, it will be seeing more, not less.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 22:53, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Ample news coverage found.  D r e a m Focus  03:58, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep, per improvements made. -- Banj e  b oi   15:45, 25 January 2010 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.