Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rio Hondo bicycle path


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

Rio Hondo bicycle path

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This is a procedural relist of a bundled AfD (see here for previous discussion). The original rationale (by User:JamesBurns) stated: "Wikipedia is neither a travelguide WP:NOTTRAVEL, nor a how-to manual WP:NOTMANUAL. Articles fail to establish why these paths are particularly notable. Some of the content in these also reads like opinion pieces, eg. "The Western Balboa section is frequented by soccer players and observers, which can make cycling tedious.", "The entire path is on the beach, affording beautiful views, mixed with the hazard of beachgoing pedestrians who do not respect the boundaries of the path." Tavix (talk) 20:53, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions.  -- — LinguistAtLarge • Talk  23:50, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep If insufficient independent notability can be merged. ChildofMidnight (talk) 02:05, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep There's much better Google results for this trail. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 04:21, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep sufficiently notable, with adequate sources. Many major recreation facilitates will qualify for Wikipedia articles. But I suggest in may nonetheless be simpler and more prudent to do these as combination articles. the information will still be there.DGG (talk) 05:49, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
 * We do have List of Los Angeles bike paths Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:44, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep per the above. There is adequate sourcing. --Oakshade (talk) 06:07, 30 March 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.