Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Riotfolk


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete all. Mind matrix  21:03, 1 January 2006 (UTC)

Riotfolk, RiotFolk, Riot Folk
Ad for an anachist collective (which is itself a bit of an oxymoron) that's only particulary notable in a small niche on the US NW. Google search only finds reference to the collective, and not a genre. Only backlinks are hastily added "Some also consider him "riotfolk". Jgritz 05:38, 19 December 2005 (UTC) Note: relisting 26/12/05, and doing so without buzzwords, too (w00t!). fuddlemark (fuddle me!) 13:20, 26 December 2005 (UTC) DELETE: I am in Riot Folk and we are just an eight member collective, there's no genre of music called riot folk. (mark gunnery)
 * Delete as non-notable. One of their singers is also up for an AfD. There's also RiotFolk and Riot Folk out there. Flyboy Will 06:32, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
 * I disagree that they are non-notable. I am based in England and saw the riot-folk collective playing at the recent G8 convergence space, a space where thousands of activists from across the world came together to resist the group of 8 nations. They toured the country and have since become well known over here.
 * preceding unsigned comment by User:Resonantstorm, his first and only wiki edit. Flyboy Will 19:44, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, non-notable. &mdash; mark &#9998; 11:29, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete - not a standard genre. Renata3 15:57, 29 December 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.