Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ripples Nigeria


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Black Kite (talk) 00:12, 12 November 2018 (UTC)

Ripples Nigeria

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This recently accepted draft appears to be lacking references which speak directly about the subject, in depth. Of the references listed, they are either to the subject's own site, in passing mentions, or not mentioned at all. A preliminary WP:BEFORE didn't unearth much more. Drewmutt ( ^ᴥ^ ) talk  20:33, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. North America1000 20:43, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. North America1000 20:43, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. North America1000 20:43, 19 October 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep I'm not sure what policy to point to but the subject itself is a Reliable Source, a media outlet with a track record of investigative journalism and an editorial board. It also has run a conference with high profile speakers. They are not a run of this mill website. In the pre internet age they would be a publisher of a newspaper but that is becoming an unsustainable model, especially in the developing world. It seems like any serious mass media news organization with a national or international focus should pass our notabioity line and if not, we should adjust our line for media. Legacypac (talk) 21:34, 19 October 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 08:58, 26 October 2018 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 09:37, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep: per Legacypac. Everything he/she said is on point.HandsomeBoy (talk) 19:25, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Does not pass WP:GNG and does not seem to have much resemblance of notability. I'm not convinced by the events they organized. w umbolo   ^^^  21:55, 9 November 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.