Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Risa Harada


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   close as improper forum as articles are already being discussed for merger. Please stop gaming the system, TTN. ··· 日本穣 ? · Talk to Nihonjoe 20:06, 20 December 2008 (UTC)

Risa Harada

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This character does not establish notability independent of D.N.Angel through the inclusion of real world information from reliable, third party sources. Most of the information is made up of original research and unnecessary plot details. There is no current assertion for future improvement of the article, so coverage independent of the character list is unnecessary. TTN (talk) 19:55, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
 * I am also nominating the following related pages because [insert reason here]:
 * TTN (talk) 19:55, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
 * TTN (talk) 19:55, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
 * TTN (talk) 19:55, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
 * TTN (talk) 19:55, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
 * TTN (talk) 19:55, 20 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Oppose all. AfD is not for merge discussions, and all of these are already being properly discussed for merging to List of D.N.Angel characters (and supported), and already in the Anime and manga project's current queue for active work being done. However apparently TTN feels there is some sort of deadline and doesn't feel actual merging is needed as he, once again, just did a wholescale redirect of all of the character articles without performing any actual merging and completing ignoring the existing discussion. These were reverted, of course, which is why I presume he is doing this AfD. Why not let us actually do the work we are doing instead of continuing to interrupt on-going work! -- Collectonian  (talk · contribs) 19:59, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
 * There is absolutely nothing that needs to be merged, as there is nothing sourced at all, so redirects should have sufficed. It would have been easy enough for someone to add any relevant plot information afterward, but everything has to revert back to the "him vs us" attitude. As these articles have nothing of any real importance, deletion is perfectly viable. TTN (talk) 20:04, 20 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions.  -- --  Collectonian  (talk · contribs) 19:59, 20 December 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.