Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rise at Orangeville


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was keep. Mailer Diablo 02:00, 7 April 2006 (UTC)

Rise at Orangeville
Non-notable geographic entry. Alex&#32;&#40;t&#41; 23:38, 2 April 2006 (UTC) Alright, I'm withdrawing my nomination. Alex&#32;&#40;t&#41; 19:09, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep Assuming it is a National Natural Landmark. DJ Clayworth 01:45, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep as a national landmark seems notable enough. -- Mithent 01:53, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep it is a National Natural Landmark, so apparently the US government thinks that it is noteworthy enough to spend money on. The article does need work though (: --Jon 02:46, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, establishs notability. Just a stub at the moment, though.  Kuru   talk  04:41, 3 April 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.