Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rise of the bloodthrusty


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   DELETE – B.hotep •talk• 08:29, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

Rise of the bloodthrusty

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

No hits on Google. Fails WP:NF AND WP:N. MS  (Talk | Contributions)  02:00, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. I had prodded this article only seconds before this nomination. No assertion of notability, sounds like a "garage movie" --  Blanchardb - Me•MyEars•MyMouth - timed 02:03, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete (speedy?) as a future film with no sources, nor any indication or even claim of notability. JJL (talk) 02:21, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete. No indication of notability. Rwxrwxrwx (talk) 10:35, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  -- the wub  "?!"  11:29, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete Fails WP:MOVIE. Not even a hint of notability asserted. '''Javért |Talk 11:35, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment – Unfortunately, there is no CSD criteria for films (although it would be easier if there was one similar to A9 for musical works). However, I would gladly make a happy faced snowman with this given a few more hours. – B.hotep •talk• 13:10, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete without prejudice until such time as notability can be shown. Currently fails WP:NFF on all sides. MichaelQSchmidt (talk) 01:21, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.