Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rishab Shetty


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn, sources found. (non-admin closure) — UY Scuti Talk  17:12, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

Rishab Shetty

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No reliable sources, only link is a brief mention on IMDB (not a reliable source and not valid to establish notability, see WP:RS/IMDB) fails both the notability criteria for actors and our general notability criteria. Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 11:53, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  sst  ✈  12:37, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  sst  ✈  12:37, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.   Musa Talk  ☻ 12:54, 22 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete as currently questionable for WP:CREATIVE. SwisterTwister   talk  06:03, 25 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep – The subject passes WP:BASIC, albeit on the weaker side. Source examples include, but are not limited to:, , , , . Importantly, note that per WP:NEXIST, topic notability is based upon source availability, rather than the state of sourcing in articles. North America1000 12:24, 29 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. North America1000 12:30, 29 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep Thank you I agree that the sources you pointed out do establish the notability of this BLP. Since the next issue was verifiability I sourced what I could in the article and tagged the rest. Even if the information that requires citation is eliminated the article would still be a viable stub, so I change my vote to keep. --Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 16:17, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Thank you for essentially withdrawing your nomination. Well done.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 16:30, 29 January 2016 (UTC)


 * WP:INDAFD: "Rishab Shetty"


 * Keep as a brand new article wished deleted six minutes after being authored and while undergoing active editing. Shame.  We have a suitable stub BLP whose topic meets WP:GNG and WP:BASIC (thanks  for sharing the obvious and being pro-active). The  and  should remember that articles are not to be judged per appearance or per being new or per being originally poorly sourced, as topic notability is to be determined through sources being available, used or not. A lack of WP:BEFORE and WP:IMPATIENCE with brand new contributions is never helpful.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 16:30, 29 January 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.