Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rishabh mukati


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Delete per WP:G11. (non-admin closure) Vulcan&#39;s Forge (talk) 16:22, 8 September 2020 (UTC)

Rishabh mukati

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unelected politician and social worker. Article does not meet GNG, BASIC, ANYBIO or NPOL. Sources in the article do not meet RS (wikis), do not mention the subject or a brief mention. BEFORE showed no SIGCOV that addresses the subject directly and in-depth.  // Timothy ::  talk  07:31, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions.   // Timothy ::  talk  07:31, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.   // Timothy ::  talk  07:31, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
 * There is a high chance that this Article could be used for malicious practices or any wrongful acts. After a minor research, I have found out that majority of the data is either a hoax or not cited. As said before, There seemed to be a potential for misusing this article for scam or such so the process of deletion should be done fast. Call me Karthik 😉🤞 (talk • contribs)
 * If you think there is a valid reason to prevent this article from deletion or there is some way you could improve it then feel free to join the discussion.
 * , The above concerns raised by are beyond my experience to handle, so I'm pinging you for assistance. Karthik, I think its a good idea to wait for guidance from BD2412, they will know how to properly handle your concerns. Thanks all.   // Timothy ::  talk  08:08, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Appreciate your help a lot. Thank you! Call me Karthik 😉🤞 (talk • contribs)


 * Delete Probably qualifies for speedy WP:G11. Anyways, it's definitely not notable. The sources aren't verifiable and most likely all are unreliable. - hako9 (talk) 10:22, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Tagged G11 aswell. - hako9 (talk) 10:30, 8 September 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.