Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Risingbd.com (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. ✗ plicit  07:04, 19 May 2023 (UTC)

Risingbd.com
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

None of the sources used provide in-depth coverage. Online-only news site with numerous vanity articles. Much of the content in the article cannot be verified or failed verification. Vinegarymass911 (talk) 05:09, 8 May 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  05:31, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: News media, Internet,  and Bangladesh. Vinegarymass911 (talk) 05:09, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:46, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete. All the cited sources either have no mention or only trivial mention of the subject. The sources in Bengali article aren't any better. Searches yield no significant coverage. Fails WP:GNG. Tutwakhamoe (talk) 03:39, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Comment Being online-only is not a reason for deletion. If it has numerous vanity articles, that would affect its reputation, but not its notability. My own impression is that although it reprints press releases (vanity articles), it does so to no greater degree than many other Bangladeshi news outlets (Daily Sun, The Daily Observer, Banglanews24.com, Jagonews24.com, ...) And risingbd.com does real reporting too, for which its reporters get beaten up, shot, and punished by the government. --Worldbruce (talk) 06:36, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete Some background is available from risingbd.com, but there isn't significant coverage in independent reliable sources, only brief mentions of a change in editorship and membership in various journalists' associations. Newspapers often have difficulty meeting WP:GNG, so essays Notability (media) and Notability (periodicals) suggest other criteria for evaluating notability. Risingbd.com has garnered an independent award for reporting on corruption, but it isn't a notable or well-known award. It is cited now and then by other newspapers and by academic works, but probably not enough to rise to the level of "regular and significant usage" or "authoritative or influential". --Worldbruce (talk) 06:45, 19 May 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.