Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Riskskill


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Geschichte (talk) 21:45, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

Riskskill

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

The only sources with significant coverage are not independent (i.e. press releases). Fails WP:NCORP (t &#183; c)  buidhe  18:52, 17 November 2021 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion: previously PRODded. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 21:25, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. (t &#183; c)  buidhe  18:52, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:14, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete: The article creator created a previous article instance under the title RiskSkill, which was speedy-deleted and the article title was protected against re-creation: . Concerning this instance, the text is promotionally-worded, setting out and praising the company's wares. Although the article claims the company was established in 2006, this press release indicates that it was set up in 2012 as a division of a firm called UKFraud (no article). The article creator removed a PROD which had been placed, but while searches find occasional announcement-based coverage (which falls under trivial coverage at WP:CORPDEPTH), there is not evidence of notability. AllyD (talk) 10:05, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete: wholly promotional. . . Mean as custard (talk) 11:43, 28 November 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.