Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rit Harrison


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Doczilla @SUPERHEROLOGIST 06:38, 3 February 2022 (UTC)

Rit Harrison

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

non-notable former National Association player, one of 10 shortstops for the New Haven Elm Citys in 1875 according to here. Aside from that passing mention and a mention in The Rank and File, nothing to confer notability. We do have some biographical details on him (married, died, born) which is better than a lot of the 19th-century permastubs. Therapyisgood (talk) 20:54, 11 January 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  00:09, 19 January 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – AssumeGoodWraith  (talk | contribs) 11:17, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:08, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Baseball-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:08, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Connecticut-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:08, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete we lack any good sourcing that would show an actual passing of GNG.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:45, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails GNG. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 16:10, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep Not sure if it counts as a reliable source but there is this profile on him, which indicates there is likely more coverage. Meets NBASEBALL as he played in a National Association match. ~ EDDY  ( talk / contribs )~ 01:16, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
 * That is a wordpress blog, so definitely not a reliable source. JoelleJay (talk) 18:33, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.