Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rita Brara Mukhopadhyay


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 03:22, 15 February 2023 (UTC)

Rita Brara Mukhopadhyay

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

I am taking this to AFD as BLPPROD is removed, and I am not sure if I can PROD this again. She failed WP:ACADEMIC, she is just an editor of a journal, but she is not the chief editor or the head editor of the journal. I didn't think she satisfied other requirements for notability. Thank you. &maltese; SunDawn &maltese;   (contact)   03:06, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Education,  and India.  &maltese; SunDawn &maltese;    (contact)   03:06, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete as WP:Too soon. On GS "Rita Brara" has an h-index of only 7. Much more is expected for this popular field. Xxanthippe (talk) 03:54, 8 February 2023 (UTC).
 * Delete. Yes, WP:Too soon. BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 07:44, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. DaffodilOcean (talk) 09:05, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment. She is the lead editor of the journal: Contributions to Indian Sociology. I have also added reviews of her 2006 book. I am not yet sure about notability. DaffodilOcean (talk) 09:20, 8 February 2023 (UTC)


 * For the Journal she is the Editor, the designation of the head of the editorial team is Editor. And The title might vary with institutions and journals. For more information, see this live link: https://journals.sagepub.com/editorial-board/CIS Bikramsharma (talk) 09:50, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete, not quite at notability for scholars. I find no additional sourcing. Oaktree b (talk) 15:32, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep. My !vote is informed by WP:NACADEMIC criterion 8 "the person has been the head or chief editor of a major, well-established academic journal in their subject area". She is the editor of the Contributions to Indian Sociology which has been in operation since since 1957 and in regular operations since 1967. It has a normal/average impact factor (just below 1.0) I think she meets the criterion. CT55555  (talk) 17:30, 8 February 2023 (UTC)


 * Keep. She also has a book with multiple published reviews. That wouldn't be enough for WP:AUTHOR by itself, but it adds to the WP:PROF case already discussed above and saves the article from WP:BIO1E. —David Eppstein (talk) 03:45, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep: Passes third line of WP:AUTHOR. She is the author of Shifting Landscapes: The Making and Remaking of Village Commons in India which has been primary subject of multiple independent periodical articles or reviews. I can find reviews from National Institute of Advanced Studies, SAGE Journals and JSTOR and periodical article from Seminar Magazine. ​​​​​​​𝐋𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐕𝐨𝐥𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐭𝟕𝟐𝟖🧙‍♂️Let's Talk ! 13:55, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep The subject passes WP:AUTHOR --- Misterrrrr (talk) 14:45, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep Reviews establish that WP:NAUTHOR is met. MrsSnoozyTurtle 03:24, 11 February 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.