Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ritesh Hada


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. I don't see any strong arguments for Keeping this article. If an editor wants to work on it in Draft space, let me know but know that an immediate move back to main space will trigger a CSD G4 speedy deletion unless there are substantial improvements. Liz Read! Talk! 22:53, 7 December 2023 (UTC)

Ritesh Hada

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Contested WP:BLAR. Ping. The article fails GNG and ANYBIO having almost no "significant" "third party" coverage from reliable media outside of being mentioned in the context of the university he founded.

argues in this edit summary that the article should be judged under WP:NPROF however, I disagree since this specific person does not fit in the traditional definition of a academic or a professor (they have zero papers or academic publications) and instead seems like a business person who happens to be involved in edtech (and thus should be judged via ANYBIO and GNG). Sohom (talk) 17:11, 23 November 2023 (UTC)


 * Unfortunately the above statements are not correct. I reverted a delete and redirect of this page by @Sohom Datta without discussion as too abrupt. I will leave to others to discuss, with my obvious opinion that WP:NPROF holds for an accredited university. Ldm1954 (talk) 17:18, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
 * I fail to see how statements are incorrect, Contested WP:BLAR means the same thing as your explanation. Anyway, lets agree to disagree and let the AFD run it's course :) Sohom (talk) 17:41, 23 November 2023 (UTC)


 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Education, Gujarat, Maharashtra, West Bengal,  and England.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  17:56, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 22:49, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
 * I do not see any reason of not considering him in GNG and ANYBIO segment.
 * Here are additional citation for the reference:
 * [Https://www.ahmedabadmirror.com/pvt-institutions-fill-up-gap-for-shortage-of-oxygen-beds/81798801.html https://www.ahmedabadmirror.com/pvt-institutions-fill-up-gap-for-shortage-of-oxygen-beds/81798801.html]
 * [Https://indianexpress.com/article/cities/gandhinagar/indian-army-purchase-general-m-m-naravane-gujarat-university-7792236/&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1700839806687361&usg=AOvVaw1la3PGyQ8dkh32RIanlYfb https://indianexpress.com/article/cities/gandhinagar/indian-army-purchase-general-m-m-naravane-gujarat-university-7792236/&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1700839806687361&usg=AOvVaw1la3PGyQ8dkh32RIanlYfb]
 * [Https://www.theweek.in/wire-updates/business/2020/09/02/pwr24-karnavati-university.html https://www.theweek.in/wire-updates/business/2020/09/02/pwr24-karnavati-university.html] Hemang.gandhi (talk) 14:33, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Non of these are specifically about the article subject. They are about the universities and other various organization the person has founded and those do not tend to confer notability (To give you a example, Innersloth, the developers of the hugely successful game Among us are not notable, but Among us itself is). Sohom (talk) 14:45, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Strong delete. Because Karnavati University (established 2017) is not a major university, being its president does not inherently make this person notable. Sources do not establish this individual's own notability. The subject does not meet criteria for NPROF, ANYBIO, or GNG. Doczilla  Ohhhhhh, no! 20:41, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete not notable, especially not when inherited from a barely notable university. microbiology Marcus (petri dish·growths)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.