Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rituraj Kishore Sinha


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WP:SNOW Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  15:47, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

Rituraj Kishore Sinha

 * – ( View AfD View log )

A non-notable businessman who fails WP:BASIC, WP:BIO. Nobility is not inherited representing a business or holding key positions. It's most likely UPE/COI spam. RationalPuff (talk) 15:23, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. RationalPuff (talk) 15:23, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. RationalPuff (talk) 15:23, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. RationalPuff (talk) 15:23, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

As per WP:BASIC people ar presumed notable if they have multiple published secondary sources which Rituraj Kishore Sinha has as per below references Kcom2020 The person is also a politician representing one of the largest political party BJP from bihar — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kcom2020 (talk • contribs) 15:45, 9 February 2021 (UTC)


 * That's not the full statement. WP:BASIC states that "People are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject."  A person known for one thing (like one company that is notable) is not notable enough to merit inclusion in a Wikipedia article; that person has to get enough coverage in the news to be presumed notable. Aasim (talk) 17:00, 9 February 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete non-notable individual. Those given sources are about Security and Intelligence Services (India). A brief mention in a source, or being the spokesperson for a company in an interview, does not give notability or meet WP:SIGCOV. None of those sources are about him. Any salvagable content can go in Security and Intelligence Services (India). ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 16:46, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Do Not DeleteWe do have published material on his personal life, CSR activity he does, humanitarian initiatives he has carried out as well as his contributions to the Indian manpower supply or security industry as a chair person of FICCI. We shall update these within 7 days of period. Kcom2020
 * You should declare your paid editing status for this subject. ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 19:24, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Simply not notable as per WP:GNG and WP:NBIO. Sources mention him, but are not about him. Jmertel23 (talk) 00:56, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:BASIC. Article is promotional. 12:47, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - promotional, does not meet WP:GNG, and of course the UPE thing.  Onel 5969  TT me 17:53, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Fluff, promotional article with no notion of notability. Oaktree b (talk) 02:47, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete non notable businessman, fails GNG. Forbes article was posted by a contributor.Ruqayya ansari (talk) 10:33, 11 February 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.