Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ritz Carlton Jakarta


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:28, 2 August 2009 (UTC)

Ritz Carlton Jakarta

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

No need for a separate article, WP:NOTNEWS Davidelit (talk) 14:05, 19 July 2009 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - WP:NOTNEWS -Falcon8765 (talk) 02:48, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Indonesia-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 18:07, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Keep - We have articles for Ritz-Carlton and other hotels that are far less notable than this one. Not a good article as of yet, but it needs editing, not deletion. Zachlipton (talk) 06:50, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete appears to be notable for a single-event 2009 Jakarta bombings so the little content could just be mentioned in the bombing article. MilborneOne (talk) 21:38, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - Even before the bombing, it was the subject of independent reliable sources, like The Jakarta Post and Bisnis Indonesia, the core criteria of WP:NOTABILITY.  A hotel of this stature opening during a time of tremendous economic growth demonstrates a historic economic turning point of this nation.--Oakshade (talk) 09:07, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment - "a historic economic turning point of this nation" - a bit over the top wouldn't you say. There have been a large number of hotels opening in recent years in Jakarta. Either there's lots of history being made or they aren't any more notable than this one ;-) Davidelit (talk) 12:37, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.