Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rivendell Institute


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Consensus here suggests that the topic does not meet notability guidelines. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 15:52, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

Rivendell Institute

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Fails WP:ORG. Lacks both significant coverage (most citations are for mere mentions) and third party coverage, let alone significant third party coverage. find appears to turn up nothing beyond mere mentions. HrafnTalkStalk(P) 07:48, 4 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete I find a few instances of trivial and incidental coverage, but no reliable source appears to have taken the time to note more than the mere existence of this organization. - 2/0 (cont.) 14:38, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep There is no requirement that it must be discussed in detail everywhere it is mentioned. Indeed if this was the criteria there would be no need for wikipedia to include anything in any article. Biofase flame | stalk 16:34, 4 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Comment: there is in fact a "requirement" that it must be "discussed in detail" somewhere in a third party source -- WP:ORG: "A company, corporation, organization, team, religion, group, product, or service is notable if it has been the subject of significant coverage in secondary sources. Such sources must be reliable, and independent of the subject." As I stated in my nomination, this organisation fails this requirement. Unless you can provide some evidence that this organisation meets this requirement, your 'keep' opinion is without foundation. HrafnTalkStalk(P) 17:47, 4 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete does not meet notability per WP:ORG Wefa (talk) 22:52, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.