Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/River's End (2005 film)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit  14:43, 16 September 2022 (UTC)

River's End (2005 film)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Article fails WP:GNG, WP:NFO and WP:NFSOURCES. I found no reviews on Rotten Tomatoes and nothing suitable was found to pass WP:NEXIST in a WP:BEFORE. The Film Creator (talk) 13:32, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. The Film Creator (talk) 13:32, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. I found a single article in Newspapers.com - I can't really find anything else to show notability or really even suggest that more coverage may be available. ReaderofthePack (formerly Tokyogirl79)  (｡◕‿◕｡)  14:15, 9 September 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.