Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RiverVoyages.com


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 02:57, 25 May 2020 (UTC)

RiverVoyages.com

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not notable per Wikipedia standards; article averages less than 1 pageview per day Wikieditor600 (talk) 18:36, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:40, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:40, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:41, 10 May 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Comment: The page views of an article are not an indication of a topic's notability and should never be used as an argument in a deletion discussion. Low page views are not a reason for an article to be deleted and high page views are not a reason for an article to be kept. Topics should be judged on their notability and coverage found in reliable sources. See WP:PAGEVIEW and WP:NOBODYREADSIT. MarkZusab (talk) 19:16, 10 May 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Barkeep49 (talk) 00:56, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete: Staying with the notability aspect of the original nomination, the nearest to a claim in the article text is the assertion (from the firm's website) that this was "one of the first travel agents to specialise in river cruises". That claim has a lot of elasticity, which is probably needed given that people have been going on river cruises long before the 9 years lifespan of this firm. Even if supported by references, I don't see that as a strong claim anyway. My searches are not finding better than routine coverage of this and World Travel Holdings' other brands. Fails WP:NCORP. AllyD (talk) 14:28, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete I am unable to locate any significant coverage with in-depth information on the company and containing independent content, references to date fail the criteria for establishing notability, topic therefore fails GNG/WP:NCORP.  HighKing++ 14:49, 22 May 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.