Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/River City Theatre Company (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. --Core desat 04:34, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

River City Theatre Company
AfDs for this article: 
 * – (View AfD) (View log)

The subject of this article patently fails the requirements of WP:N, with not a single reliable independent source to confirm even local notability. Recreated after it was deleted via PROD, the last AFD resulted in no consensus. I see no reason for this, as it is abundantly clear that the article has not, and cannot, be verified. There is no point in cleaning up an article that fails notability guidelines and lacks sources, as any attempt to verify facts will obviously fall short if no sources exist. Without sources, this article is simply free advertising. VanTucky (talk) 15:18, 5 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Comment &mdash; There do appear to be independent sources available, and some local notability. &mdash; RJH (talk) 15:43, 5 September 2007 (UTC)


 * keep - fix with RJH's references. --Rocksanddirt 22:06, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletions.   -- John Vandenberg 23:23, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Local, amateur theatre group. The first two 'refs' above are based on the same audio system seller's press release touting their 'pro bono' work, the second two are a local, amateur theatre association. Last AfD was 4 deletes to 1 keep by my count--I would have called that consensus. Hellosandimas 01:34, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete I also see no reason to believe it has any notability outside the local area Corpx 04:34, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Non-notable amateur group. Keb25 16:15, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.