Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/River Coruisk


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure)  TB randley  16:58, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

River Coruisk

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article's only source is an Answers.com link; no other sources available to confirm the purpose of the article which is that it "may be the smallest river in the United Kingdom". — Cargoking   talk  15:30, 14 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:37, 14 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep - the river is notable in any case, irrespective of crap referencing. Poorly written and referenced content is never a solid base on which to propose deletion. Simply remove the rubbish content. --Mais oui! (talk) 17:48, 14 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep I've added two references using Google Books, a resource which could have been used before making this AfD nomination. AllyD (talk) 18:16, 14 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep You can find it in Google Maps. scope_creep (talk) 18:30, 14 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep per above and per WP:NGEO, but the references I saw all refer to this as River Scavaig; should the article be moved/renamed?--Arxiloxos (talk) 01:14, 15 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep - its existence and short length is easily verifiable from the OS maps. Though the OS maps name it Scavaig River, that seems to be the most common name, so I think it should be moved. --Vclaw (talk) 21:46, 16 April 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.