Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/River Oceanus


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Plane (Dungeons & Dragons). Hatnotes can be handled as required later  So Why  09:57, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

River Oceanus

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This article does not establish notability. TTN (talk) 00:00, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 00:00, 20 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete it's a fictional location with no out-of-universe notability demonstrated (nor likely). Power~enwiki (talk) 02:35, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep or merge to Plane (Dungeons & Dragons). BOZ (talk) 05:54, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete- excessively detailed fancruft about a fictional location. Poorly sourced and no indication of real-world notability. Unlikely that merging any of this stuff to another article would improve anything. Reyk  YO!  14:50, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Merge a short paragraph into the relevant section Plane (Dungeons & Dragons), and probably retarget to Oceanus (the Greek personification of the world river, which would have often been called the River Oceanus), and hatnote if merged. Patar knight - chat/contributions 16:09, 21 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep and expand. As noted by Patar Knight, this appears to be an in popular culture instantiation of a real mythological feature: . Jclemens (talk) 05:23, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete or merge per BOZ. Nothing suggests independent notability. Suggesting it is notable because it is inspired by some real mythology, is, well, pathetic. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 04:12, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Merge to Plane (Dungeons & Dragons) given above commentary. I do not see how a discussion on the Greek mythological reference is relevant to this discussion. Aoba47 (talk) 23:43, 25 June 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.