Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/River Skerne


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Snowball keep - Accepted convention on Wikipedia is that rivers are notable enough to sustain articles. Needing improvement is never a reason to delete an article. Mjroots (talk) 07:47, 17 May 2012 (UTC)

River Skerne
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Badly written original research Wikibusker (talk) 18:00, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2012 May 16.  Snotbot   t &bull; c &raquo;  18:42, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep - The nom has not provided a valid reason to delete this article, but only reasons to improve it. Significant river that the city of Darlington was built around.  Has had incredible amounts of coverage. .  The AfD on the page was the nom's 2nd edit ever.   Socks anyone? --Oakshade (talk) 03:23, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.