Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/River Valley Primary School


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to River Valley, Singapore. (Non-administrator closure) NorthAmerica1000 03:40, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

River Valley Primary School

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

NN primary school. We don't generally provide stand-alone articles for such schools, absent a level of RS coverage not present here. Epeefleche (talk) 17:25, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:51, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:52, 14 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete no significant coverage in independent reliable sources, fails WP:GNG. --Bejnar (talk) 06:10, 17 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Redirect to River Valley, Singapore or County Cork per long-standing precedent as documented at WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES - which  is simply  a review of the facts as they  are and neither a policy  nor  a guideline. Nevertheless, the 1000s of redirects in  the 'R from School' cat are ample evidence alone of the way  the community  has generally  agreed to  treat  such  creations. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 08:42, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Redirect as always. There has never been consensus to delete these schools, and consistency is desirable. What is not desirable is having1000s of afds in the subject field.  DGG ( talk ) 16:16, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Redirect .... Losing the will to live!. – Davey 2010 •  (talk)  02:19, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Redirect per longstanding consensus at AfD that all but the most exceptional elementary schools are presumed non-notable. (Does this really need to run through AfD?) Carrite (talk) 20:33, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
 * No, of course it doesn't. It's just  a waste of all  our time. Someone want  to  do  a quick  SNOW close followed by  the inevitable redirect? (We can't  because we have already !voted). Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 09:45, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.