Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/River dogs


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy deleted by User:Jimfbleak per CSD A7, with the closing comment, "No explanation of significance (real person/animal/organization/web content/organized event)." (Non-administrator discussion closure.) Northamerica1000(talk) 17:19, 11 August 2013 (UTC)

River dogs

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Disputed PROD. Reason was "Rambling anecdotal blog style item, not a notable encyclopaedia article" Fiddle   Faddle  16:38, 9 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Strong delete per nom. Pretty close to an A7 speedy deletion. Clarityfiend (talk) 18:40, 9 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Strong delete. This is effectively an A1 speedy (who knows which paragraph is supposed to be the topic?) and the hockey material qualifies for A7 as well. There's no encyclopedia article here. 168.12.253.66 (talk) 19:06, 9 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - disagree with A1 (applies to very short articles only) and A7 (not fully covered), but should be deleted as combination spam/essay/made-up/incoherent. Note, I replaced the AfD tag the creator removed. Ansh666 20:42, 9 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - unsalvageable mess of essay-type material. AndrewWTaylor (talk) 21:56, 9 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organisms-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:44, 10 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:44, 10 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete, obviously. Wikipedia is not a free webhost. Resolute 02:16, 10 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete. Unencyclopedic entry about disparate non-notable topics. Gobōnobō  + c 20:54, 10 August 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.