Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/River of Blood


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –  Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 03:26, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

River of Blood

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This fails to establish notability. TTN (talk) 20:21, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 20:24, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 20:24, 20 December 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete- Minor fictional event with no non-primary sources. Heck, there's barely any primary sources on it.  Searching for it in the usual places brings up virtually nothing of note.  Normally, I'd suggest a redirect to Greyhawk or some such, but this is such a minor, inconsequential thing, that I don't think even that is appropriate.  64.183.45.226 (talk) 21:41, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep or merge to Flanaess. BOZ (talk) 03:53, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete and redirect to Rivers of Blood speech, which is likely what anyone searching for this is looking for. Josh Milburn (talk) 04:39, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, st170e talk 00:22, 28 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Merge with Flanaess which seems to be the fate of many similar articles. Probably move and redirect Rivers of Blood speech to Rivers of Blood as primary topic (and coincidentlaly, where Rivers of blood with a lowercase b already redirects). Timothy Joseph Wood  14:22, 28 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-notable fictioncruft (no third-party sources), and redirect to Rivers of Blood speech as the likely real-world search result.  Sandstein   19:18, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete/Merge: Article/subject itself fails notability criterion and as such doesn't warrant a standalone article. If not straight deleted, should point to Flanaess at best. GauchoDude (talk) 22:57, 5 January 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.