Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/River of Ruin


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. --  Phantom Steve / talk &#124; contribs \ 03:15, 3 November 2010 (UTC)

River of Ruin

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Delete. Non-notable per WP:BK. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 22:58, 20 October 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  --  Marcus   Qwertyus   00:05, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Merge to author page no sense in deleting the content, the article just doesn't prove it's own notability, Sadads (talk) 19:52, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Keep: This nom was one of a bunch all at once by the nominator that even included novels by John Grisham. I don't have the time or inclination to look into yet another one, but everyone I looked at was a keep, and in the absence of a understandable basis for this nomination, we should keep this one as well.  Nominator never even explained why he did the raft of nominations on his talk page when multiple editors queried.--Milowent • talkblp-r  05:36, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. Notable book by notable author, it has received reviews in reliable sources like Cahners and PW.  --Arxiloxos (talk) 07:42, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.