Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/River water disputes in Telangana state


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. –  Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:45, 26 June 2014 (UTC)

River water disputes in Telangana state

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Pure CRYSTAL stuff...there are no water disputes now....no problem to have an article if the disputes arise....but it makes no sense to predict them now and have an article about it!  ƬheStrike  Σagle  sorties  02:49, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. Per nom. If Telanga becomes a seperate state, then there are "concerns that river water disputes may arise". Article topic is pure speculation based on two currently uncertain conditions being met at some undetermined future time. Philg88 ♦talk 07:15, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  Philg88 ♦talk 07:04, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:58, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:58, 7 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Comment: While still speculative in nature, the water sharing crisis of Telangana and AP has been discussed well by media.
 * For Telangana, sharing water & power will be key challenge The Hindu
 * Telangana could mean dry days for Andhra farmers Hindustan Times
 * By the rivers of Telangana The Hindu. The issue of future-water-sharing crisis was also a major point of discussion while the two states split up. Telangana Bill gives key role to Centre in water management Deccan Chronicle. So its not all together a fictional problem. §§ Dharmadhyaksha §§ {T/C} 13:26, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  04:12, 16 June 2014 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.