Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rivers and Harbors Bill


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Tone 14:59, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

Rivers and Harbors Bill

 * – ( View AfD View log )

No references, Unverifiable content Ingadres (talk) 12:36, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep, speedy close. With more than 300 GBooks hits showing historical significance, the matter is clearly notable. The article clearly needs work, of course. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 15:00, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The article still fails WP:V, can you please at least rewrite it based on any reliable sources? Ingadres (talk) 19:53, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep. I made the necessary fixes, added new material and four references, and it is no longer orphaned. Rjensen (talk) 10:11, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions.  -- Danger (talk) 01:49, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions.  -- Danger (talk) 01:49, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions.  -- Danger (talk) 01:49, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.