Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Riverside Country


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  MBisanz  talk 18:24, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

Riverside Country

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Delete. Poorly sourced article about a radio program. As a syndicated program that was distributed on an ad hoc network of stations, this would be eligible for an article per WP:NMEDIA if it were properly sourced, but the only reference here is the program's own self-published (and deadlinked) website about itself -- which is not a source that can confer notability. But no strong media coverage is locatable on either Google News or ProQuest, which means that we can't hang on to an article just because the thing existed. Bearcat (talk) 22:43, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   &#9742;   &#9998;  23:52, 24 August 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete - Page's only reference is self-published and not much else out there confirming any notability. Meatsgains (talk) 19:02, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 06:34, 26 August 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jujutacular (talk) 02:47, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete per the lack of significant coverage in reliable sources. I was unable to find significant coverage about the subject in my searches for sources. There is insufficient coverage in reliable sources to allow Riverside Country to pass Notability, which requires "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject". Cunard (talk) 00:44, 10 September 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.