Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Riverside Restaurant


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. NW ( Talk ) 15:45, 27 August 2009 (UTC)

Riverside Restaurant

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This is a blatant advert for a restaurant It has no place on Wikipedia. Simple Bob (talk) 15:18, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  -- – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 17:17, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions.  -- – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 17:18, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak keep Good indications of notability and significant history. The addition of citations with more substantial coverage would be helpful. ChildofMidnight (talk) 19:52, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Thryduulf (talk) 19:47, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. I'll admit that the leading paragraph does make the article look a bit spammy, but this is more like an attempt to assert the restaurant's notability, and I think there's enough here to qualify. Maybe put most of the critical acclaim somewhere other than the lead paragraph. Chris Neville-Smith (talk) 21:10, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep I think it can be saved, so I flagged it for rescue. The article appear to meet WP:NOT based on the number of references found in a cursory search. The intro can be rewritten and additional sources added. Geoff  TC 19:49, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.