Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Riz Mokal


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Yunshui 雲 水 14:04, 21 May 2020 (UTC)

Riz Mokal

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I am the article's subject, and am not "notable" and am a private person, and I request the article's deletion. Thanks. WhatNotability (talk) 13:37, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 14:22, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 14:22, 14 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete. Other than the ‘controversy’ section we’d happily delete this bio, and the controversy itself is entirely trivial. Mccapra (talk) 14:53, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:BIODEL /Tpdwkouaa (talk) 17:57, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete clearly not a person who is so notable we need an article on them against their will.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:14, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete Per WP:BLP1E. 's talk page! 21:10, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete not enough notability to keep if he has specifically asked to have it deleted. Could easily become another flamewar/slander magnet, which is the last thing Wikipedia needs. Dronebogus (talk) 22:08, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete his entry seems to be here because of what he said on twatter. Not a good precedent. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:23C4:5602:2301:AC5F:FDB5:2CFE:83A2 (talk) 22:30, 15 May 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.