Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rizwan Rana


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 01:57, 29 April 2017 (UTC)

Rizwan Rana

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails to meet WP:BIO. In addition, none of the sources provided do anything to confirm notability. Seems to come off as a self promotional piece. Skamecrazy123 (talk) 21:20, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions.   CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   21:38, 21 April 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete - I found some press coverage in reliable sources on "Rizwan Rana" but I assume this one is a different person. cited sources in this bio are primary and not reliable.--Saqib (talk) 08:52, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

— Sunny315 (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Keep - I found Rizwan Rana on Google Scholar and research papers are same which are entered in Wikipedia. I also read one of the research paper that published in London and it is the Contribution in research. However there are some minor issues on "Early Life" section but whole this article is fine and reliable. I found no reason to delete.--Sunny315 (talk) 07:30, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Where was this paper published? --Skamecrazy123 (talk) 14:33, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Papers links are given in references. --Sunny315 (talk) 14:33, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:37, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:37, 24 April 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete my searches are just not finding sources, and the article itself gives little indication of achievement notable by our metrics.E.M.Gregory (talk) 21:52, 27 April 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.