Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rkdhaugoda's general theory of vasculitis


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Delete per WP:SNOW. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 17:45, 10 March 2013 (UTC)

Rkdhaugoda's general theory of vasculitis

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Original research Theroadislong (talk) 12:39, 10 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Speedy Delete Appears to be something made up by a single person. Nearly unreadable. Clearly original research, with no sources whatsoever. FurrySings (talk) 12:46, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
 * The speedy tag was removed by the article's creator  so I bought it here instead.Theroadislong (talk) 13:43, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Your not allowed to remove speedy deletion templates from articles that you created. Michaelzeng7 (talk) 16:23, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
 * I have restored the improperly-deleted speedy tag. --Nat Gertler (talk) 16:40, 10 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete. WP:MADEUP. Pburka (talk) 14:52, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. Michaelzeng7 (talk) 16:25, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - I'd say it was pure WP:OR, but it's also WP:PROMO, so I guess one can't call it pure. --Nat Gertler (talk)
 * Delete per all above. If this was a real medical theory, the article wouldn't contain sentences such as "Idealism also creates fear of nuclear war, various regional wars (Israel & Palestine, Lebnon, America, Iraq, and Afganistan),in Nepal, the impending conflicts between janjaties and non janjati ,pahadi and madeshi ,tharu and non tharu madehi due to slogan of unscientific single racial identity of INGOs and Nepali Maoist party( EXTREMIST AND FAKE-COMMUNIST PARTY ). environmental nuclear pollution, poverty, starvation and many human crisis situations." --Metropolitan90 (talk) 17:28, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete this really could have been speedy deleted. This seems to be entirely made up. Ducknish (talk) 17:35, 10 March 2013 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.