Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RnaR (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Delete. by User:Anthony Bradbury (non-admin closure) —MdsShakil (talk) 01:04, 26 January 2022 (UTC)

RnaR
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

I still stand by my last afd.

"Non notable YouTuber. Having 1 million subscriber doesn’t mean you are automatically notable and will get an wikipedia article. There are some refs in the article but they are all primary source (they are interviews with the article's subject making them not independent from the subject). I didn’t find any significant coverage that are independent of the subject. Subject didn’t won any major award or anything. Fails every criteria of WP:GNG, WP:ENTERTAINER."

Since the last afd, only thing changed is that he got a non-notable award. আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 21:11, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Courtesy ping who participated in the last afd. --আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 21:15, 25 January 2022 (UTC)


 * Delete Does not appear to be notable, no significant coverage available and fails WP:ENTERTAINER. Garnarblarnar (talk) 21:16, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep I disagree with nominators rationale that There are some refs in the article but they are all primary source (they are interviews with the article's subject making them not independent from the subject). While some of them do contain a interviews as a small portion, they do contain independent coverage. Some sources do not contain primary materials at all, such as this. Tame (talk) 21:20, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Entertainment-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:26, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:26, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:26, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment With taking a deeper look, I think the notability is indeed questionable. Especially regarding the primary materials. I have come to a conclusion of self-moving it to draftspace (as new sources might arise with time), and CSDing the redirect. I guess there's no need of discussion any further. Expecting an AFD closure. Tame (talk) 21:36, 25 January 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.