Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Road Rules: The Battlegrounds (2009)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy delete, author requested deletion (see below comment).  Jamie ☆ S93  15:22, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

Road Rules: The Battlegrounds (2009)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

The series is out of production. I can't find any reliable sources that the series is returning and, even if it is, this is a violation of WP:CRYSTAL.  ceran  thor 13:31, 13 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete: Support per nom. If it is real, the page can be recreated. SpikeJones (talk) 15:39, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: This is make believe and to my knowledge BMP has no plans to film another season of Road Rules after the ratings disaster that was Viewer's Revenge. While entertaining in nature, this should be removed asap as it is more a fan fantasy than anything based on fact or sourcing. Neutralis (talk) 13:30, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 17:05, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
 * It is verifiable. I have photos of it but BMP(The Producers) does not give me the permission to do so to post them. Please, just hold off with this for a bit, and then I shall provide some sources. It will be revealed one month before the next challenge(spin-off series) which airs in the fall. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Apple5212 (talk • contribs) 14:53, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
 * It is only verifiable if there are reliable sources. Saying there are sources but not posting any does not qualify an article for inclusion into Wikipedia. I have searched extensively for even a mention of said season and there is not even an unreliable source that is claiming that such a project is in development. Actually, a google search pulls up ZERO articles. There is no harm in deleting this article and then bringing it back if at one point actual sourcing develops. However, Wikipedia is not a gossip mill for fan fantasy.Neutralis (talk) 15:30, 16 June 2009 (UTC)


 * That is understandable. --Apple5212 (talk) 15:42, 16 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete: As per SpikeJones and Ceranthor. Plastikspork (talk) 20:22, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: this turned out to be false. I vote for deletion. It will never be back. I think we should close it quick since rumors will be spread... quickly... --Apple5212 (talk) 13:48, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.