Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roar (Ramesh) Bjonnes


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 05:37, 29 July 2022 (UTC)

Roar (Ramesh) Bjonnes

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Subject fails GNG and ANYBIO. Almost everything I could find on the subject and what's provided here is either what the subject published themselves or mere mentions. Chris Troutman ( talk ) 19:58, 16 July 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:25, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Spirituality,  and Norway.  Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 19:59, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete for lack of notability (WP:NBIO). Of the cited sources, only Prout (Progressive utilization theory) and Mount of Oaks were secondary. Of those, Mount of Oaks was not substantial coverage and Prout was mostly about the book (the coverage of Bjonnes was not substantial). A BEFORE search revealed no substantial coverage in reliable secondary independent sources. Best, KevinL ( aka L235 · t · c) 20:53, 28 July 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


 * Delete: It fails WP:GNG and WP:ANYBIO BBSTOP (talk) 06:16, 19 August 2022 (UTC)