Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roaring Guns


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure)  EN  - Jungwon  06:04, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

Roaring Guns

 * – ( View AfD View log )

No source cited. Fails WP:NFILMS  Jen yir e2  20:37, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  Jen yir e2  20:37, 5 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Speedy keep as meets film notability. Source I added has 3 reviews excerpted. BEFORE was incomplete --DiamondRemley39 (talk) 23:36, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep as notable per multiple mentions in Google Books search results here. Erik (talk &#124; contrib) (ping me) 00:06, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep Per Erik and DiamondRemley39 Donaldd23 (talk) 17:15, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep as has significant reliable sources book coverage which has been added to the article so that WP:GNG is passed and deletion is unnecessary in my view, Atlantic306 (talk) 00:36, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - sources added to the article are mere listings, not in-depth coverage. Meets neither WP:GNG or WP:NFILM.  Onel 5969  TT me 03:30, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep Not super happy with the relatively sparse coverage, but what I'd expect for a minor yet notable film of its era; considering Google Books' recency bias, there's likely quite a bit more, perhaps even room for some real expansion. Vaticidalprophet (talk) 15:20, 12 March 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.