Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roarke


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to In Death and disambiguate. (non-admin closure)  J 947(c) (m) 06:31, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Roarke

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

nn fictional character, no RS Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 03:57, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:36, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Make into disambig- there are enough real people named Roarke that this title is plausible as a disambig. Obviously the current content is unsuitable for the encyclopedia. If it seems likely that people will edit war to restore the fictional content, deleting first is an option. Reyk  YO!  07:56, 26 August 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:45, 31 August 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Merge into In Death and replace with disambiguation. The article on the series contains almost nothing but a list of books, and it's entirely reasonable to expect that the two characters who are the central figures and who tie the whole thing together (the other being Eve Dallas) should be principally described there. And the comment above is right: there are a lot of Roarkes—Mr. Roarke is surely better known. Mangoe (talk) 17:23, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  J 947(c) (m) 05:05, 7 September 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:31, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Disambiguate I am surprised this slightly promo article is filling such a useful disamig spot. &Alpha; Guy into Books &trade;  &sect; ( Message ) -  07:47, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 05:13, 15 September 2017 (UTC)


 * Merge into In Death and replace with disambiguation seems like the most appropriate course of action in this case. Aoba47 (talk) 15:24, 15 September 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.