Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rob Costlow


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. ( X! ·  talk )  · @092  · 01:12, 31 July 2009 (UTC)

Rob Costlow

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

The only possible way this doesn't fail WP:BAND is if the "Independent Music Awards" counts as a "major music award". Since we don't have an article on them, I'm guessing not. &mdash; Chowbok  ☠  20:45, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  -- ( X!  ·  talk )  · @926  · 21:13, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Rob had not recived any Awards. But he has got many fan following and his creation has been used in many media. I think we should get grace period before taking any step-- Suyog talk to me!  04:29, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Well, the article can always be recreated if he meets one of the notability criteria in the future.&mdash; Chowbok  ☠  04:48, 26 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete. Is the IMA a notable award.....ahhhhh, no. Is this guy notable.....ahhhhh, no. Fails to meet WP:MUSIC. Searching finds no significant coverage in reliable, third-party, sources.   Esradekan Gibb    "Klat" 12:04, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Oppose David Nevue article also dont fulfill this criteria, but its still there. what about that?-- Suyog talk to me!  13:34, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Please see Other stuff exists.&mdash; Chowbok  ☠  14:14, 27 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete. No evidence of coverage sufficient to meet the WP:GNG. — Satori Son 21:12, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - good luck on his career. When he gets coverage in reliable sources, then an article would be appropriate. -- Whpq (talk) 16:40, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.