Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rob Eastman III


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.   A rbitrarily 0   ( talk ) 16:12, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

Rob Eastman III

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Not notable. None of the references are reliable sources that support notability. Running for congress in and of itself does not make one notable. No Google hits supporting notability. There is some mionor coverage of his company's products, but that does not translate to this individual being notable. Singularity42 (talk) 17:40, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this person. ☭  Pick both man lol  ☭ 17:47, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per failing WP:GNG and possibly WP:BLP at this time. ArcAngel (talk) 17:57, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this person. Joe Chill (talk) 18:36, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment: Your late. ☭  Pick both man lol  ☭ 18:40, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
 * What? Joe Chill (talk) 18:41, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
 * I think he's trying to say he beat you on your comment. :) ArcAngel (talk) 18:48, 21 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:19, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.