Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rob Page (wrestler)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete.--Fuhghettaboutit 05:06, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

Rob Page (wrestler)

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Contested prod. Non notable wrestler, no evidence of multiple independent non-trivial reliable sources, fails WP:BIO. One Night In Hackney 303 21:09, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment- What is the WAA that is referred to in the article? Thunderwing 21:23, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment I'm not sure, but I'm now thinking definite hoax. His own site is quite revealing as well. One Night In Hackney 303 21:29, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment If you read it is WWA, not WAA. WWA being Westworld Wrestling Association which was based out of Memphis. Perhaps one should not jump to delete when they have not even read the article correctly.
 * Comment 3 Ghits for "Westworld Wrestling Association", and all directory entries. One Night In Hackney 303 23:47, 8 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete- if WAA is a hoax then there is no way this article can meet WP:BIO Thunderwing 21:32, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Lack of notability. Lack of verifiable information. Vassyana 04:48, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Possible hoax, and no reliable third party sources anyhow.  RFerreira 08:32, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment If you look at DDP's website or DDP's myspace you find him. www.myspace.com/yrgworkout is DDP's official myspace and has this guy listed on there as dose his official website www.diamonddallaspage.com —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 76.223.172.62 (talk) 12:49, 9 May 2007 (UTC).
 * Comment That would be Diamond Dallas Page, please stop linking to an unrelated site. One Night In Hackney 303 13:26, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment The guy is a legit wrestler, the debate should be if he is relevant. OldSchool67 User talk:OldSchool67 15:09, 9 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete per above comments, lacks any verifiable redeeming information. Burntsauce 16:14, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.