Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rob Peabody


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 09:11, 31 October 2019 (UTC)

Rob Peabody

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Dreadfully promotional article about a non-notable individual. The sources used in the article are not independent or reliable: is written by his own organization; the other two references are dead but one is from the site "Fresh Expressions" which Peabody is affiliated with and one is from a Christian music licensing site. A WP:BEFORE search for "Rob Peabody pastor", "Rob Peabody VOMO" etc. only brings up press releases, blogs and non-independent sites. Fails WP:GNG. SpicyMilkBoy (talk) 08:05, 24 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. SpicyMilkBoy (talk) 08:05, 24 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. SpicyMilkBoy (talk) 08:05, 24 October 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete - References are entirely lacking, and I can find nothing better. Fails WP:GNG. Hugsyrup 10:08, 24 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:43, 24 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:43, 24 October 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete. I find nothing in WP:RS suggesting notability is met. Article is written in a wholly unencyclopedic manner. -- Kinu t/c 06:09, 26 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Also, the way it is written, it sounds like coat-rack spam: "the technology that is igniting a volunteer movement" and wording telling people to "join" the website by clicking on a link probably makes this a WP:CSD candidate. Since I've already !voted, I'll leave that to another set of eyes. -- Kinu t/c</i> 06:13, 26 October 2019 (UTC)
 * I definitely agree that it reads like spam, and there's obvious COI editing going on too. I thought about nominating it for speedy deletion, but since it's been around since 2014 I decided to play it safe with AfD. SpicyMilkBoy (talk) 06:31, 26 October 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.