Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rob Ring


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Courcelles (talk) 02:51, 12 July 2010 (UTC)

Rob Ring

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )


 * Notability, reliable sources, and conflict of interest are issues. Appears to be promotional, with descriptions of work without any sources to support their significance, and many sources that are either not reliable, or that make only a glancing reference to the subject. Not a single reliable source specifically about this artist. Discussed at article talk page . JNW (talk) 18:18, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions.  — freshacconci  talk talk  21:32, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Sources on Cafka, not Rob Ring.  Racconish  Tk  20:45, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. No substantial coverage of subject. Spammy and promotional. SPA and COI. Christopher Connor (talk) 00:06, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.