Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rob Schoeben


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 05:43, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

Rob Schoeben

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

non notable. The person who principally developed the products listed here (if it was a single person) would be notable; the person in charge of marketing them is not. Additionally, there seem to be no usable references--the ones in earlier versions of the article are about the products.  DGG ( talk ) 01:54, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as nothing suggests a better applicably notable article. SwisterTwister   talk  03:30, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  03:30, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  03:30, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  03:30, 11 February 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete - Fails WP:ANYBIO and WP:NRV. The article itself is written like a resume, but does not indicate significant contributions to warrant notability. A search through Questia shows three minor one-line mentions, as a group leader in marketing at Microsoft, as head of Apple's product marketing, and as chief marketing officer at Carbon3D. A general web search shows his mention on social media, linkedin and other user-generated sites. None mention any notable achievements. — Maile (talk) 14:56, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete A medium ranking executive like millions of others. Philafrenzy (talk) 23:05, 17 February 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.