Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rob Wolchek


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. utcursch | talk 11:07, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

Rob Wolchek

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Previously PRODded for lack of notability or sources; untagged without addressing either of these concerns; besides one instance of vandalism has not been improved for three months. — PSUMark2006   talk  |  contribs  03:37, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - by research sheds no light on the notability of this news reporter. Note: the creation of this article is the only edit contribution made by the editor since registering. Luke! 18:15, 19 March 2007 (UTC)


 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mailer Diablo 08:05, 25 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Weak keep: The article, as it stands, is just a stub. References can be added to it. The only concern is notability. As of now, I did not find enough secondary sources discussing him. However, if the fact that he won 23 emmys as stated in the article, is really true, then he deserves an article. --  soum  (0_o) 10:46, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, As per Patstuart's evidence. --  soum  (0_o) 03:31, 31 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Strong delete - clearly non-notable; the comment on "23 emmy awards" is totally misleading, if not false: they're local to detroit emmy's: . Thus no claim to establish notability. Patstuarttalk·edits 02:10, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.