Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robbie Middleton


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) – Davey 2010 Talk 00:29, 14 December 2015 (UTC)

Robbie Middleton

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This person seems to have been the victim of a tragic crime, but there's no evidence that either the crime or its victim is notable. FreeKnowledgeCreator (talk) 02:35, 8 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 10:17, 8 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 10:17, 8 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 10:17, 8 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep: Notable. The media sources provided initially for the story are from NY Daily News, NBC News and The Daily Mail. Pretty sure that many other media also covered it as significant and notable. The court ruled for a record compensation for the victim's family. After request for deletion of article, Just to address colleague editor's reasoning that no indication that the crime or the victim are notable, I have added further stories run in the Houston Chronicle, The Daily Mirror, The Huffington Post and ABC News as well. All these are very big mainstream media not some local page. There are plenty more to add as sources if needed, but I believe the ones I have added would suffice to address the colleague's concerns. werldwayd (talk) 13:32, 8 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep - sources provides notability. article has improved since nom as well.--BabbaQ (talk) 18:02, 8 December 2015 (UTC)
 * The crime may be notable. It should be clear that the person the crime was committed against is not. FreeKnowledgeCreator (talk) 21:40, 8 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep. As already shown, extensively covered in major media.  I can't see any benefit to the encyclopedia, or overarching values that would be served, by removing this content. --Arxiloxos (talk) 00:46, 9 December 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.