Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robbie Willmott (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:22, 27 March 2012 (UTC)

Robbie Willmott
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log )

Footballer fails WP:NFOOTY as has not played at a fully-professional level of football. Also a lack of any significant media coverage beyond the WP:NTEMP and WP:ROUTINE sports coverage (match reports etc). --Jimbo[online] 21:32, 4 March 2012 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. --Jimbo[online] 21:34, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - doesn't have the "significant" coverage required to meet GNG; also fails WP:NFOOTBALL. GiantSnowman 09:19, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions.  — Frankie (talk) 20:26, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.  — Frankie (talk) 20:26, 5 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep: Looks like it passes WP:GNG. See this, this, this, this, this, this. --LauraHale (talk) 20:45, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment, what isn't routine sports coverage about those? --Jimbo[online] 15:15, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
 * That link is about notability of events, so is irrelevant to a discussion about a person. Phil Bridger (talk) 22:26, 10 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Is not signing for a club an event? They still fail WP:NTEMP by quite a way. There's substantial that tells us why he's notable as a person beyond signing for a club or being name-checked in a match report (mainly from local newspapers that report specifically on their local clubs). --Jimbo[online] 22:38, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:13, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 23:48, 19 March 2012 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.