Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robbin Harms


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:33, 23 June 2019 (UTC)

Robbin Harms

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Does not meet WP:BLPPROD requirement of articles containing "no sources in any form". However, it does not meet the requirement of "All BLPs must have at least one source that supports at least one statement made about the person in the article". Snowycats (talk) 17:22, 15 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Snowycats (talk) 17:22, 15 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Snowycats (talk) 17:22, 15 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Denmark-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:36, 15 June 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep As far as I can see, he meets WP:NMOTORSPORT #3 "Competed in a series or race of worldwide or national interest", and perhaps also #1 (though I don't know what counts as "a fully professional series"). This guy has raced in Grand Prix races in many countries (definitely of national interest in those countries, and some also definitely of international interest). Not having sources is not a reason to delete an article, per WP:NEXIST, so why bring it to AfD? Why not just find and add "at least one source that supports at least one statement made about the person in the article"???? I have added one source, so it's no longer unsourced, but I am really not interested in motorsports. Did the nominator do WP:BEFORE, especially "The minimum search expected is a normal Google search, a Google Books search, a Google News search, and a Google News archive search"? and note "If you find that adequate sources do appear to exist, the fact that they are not yet present in the article is not a proper basis for a nomination. Instead, you should consider citing the sources". RebeccaGreen (talk) 20:24, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep. Added a reference, and based on a review of the available sources, site:.dk searches in particular, the article can easily be referenced to meet WP:BASIC, apart from it already meeting WP:NMOTORSPORT #3. This nomination with a spurious boilerplate rationale was filed only 24 seconds after nominator's previous edit. Would nominator please explain which P&Gs they took into consideration before filing here? Should they wish to withdraw the nomination, they may chose to follow WP:WDAFD and add  immediately below the nomination statement. Sam Sailor 08:22, 23 June 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.