Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robby Maria


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 05:02, 15 February 2022 (UTC)

Robby Maria

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

He made a Self-PR. Nor relevant for Wikipedia. No good Sources. --Tromla (talk) 23:10, 15 January 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 01:19, 25 January 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   20:11, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment, I have fixed the formatting on this and added it to 18th Jan AfD list, as it was not live until this point (despite the afd page being created on 15th Jan). I have no opinion on the afd itself. Bungle (talk • contribs) 18:03, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Bungle (talk • contribs) 18:05, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Bungle (talk • contribs) 18:05, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Argentina-related deletion discussions. Bungle (talk • contribs) 18:05, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment Another weirdly sourced article, where the citations only give the titles of the page they link to. Seems like excessive citations, some seem almost useless. Oaktree b (talk) 02:08, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment There are several articles in German or another language posted on issuu.com which would seem in-depth, but since I cannot read them, I will not be voting. Should someone confirm these articles check out and are in-depth, then I will change my vote to Keep. Chelokabob (talk) 01:33, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * This is borderline malpractice. What’s labeled “German National TV“ is a municipal Public-access television station. The six sources for the introduction are mostly dead, the GND link works but does not, and has never, mentioned anything connected to the paragraph. I can definitely say that there is not and was never a ‘cult following’. The Teehaus Open Air is some beer garden’s summer promo event, and the only serious source is the Rheinische Post (mislabeled and typo’ed “Rhur something”. The others are street zines that take whatever contributions they get, the Böblinger something is the artist’s very very local paper doing a local-guy-makes-it-big-in-regional-sub center routine.   K. Oblique  18:05, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
 * The German Wiki article is now deleted. Tromla (talk) 01:43, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 03:24, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:14, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Austria-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:14, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:16, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Louisiana-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:17, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.